Turbo

Contributing Member
  • Content count

    342
  • Joined

  • Last visited


Everything posted by Turbo

  1. Turbo added a post in a topic Static port   

    Man, Buckchop, that sounds rugged!  I have found some relief with vitamin E, but am probing magnesium to find the best dose for me.  Some literature is panning vitamin E as bad for the heart in the larger doses, like 800 mg.  But hey, we all remember when eggs were "bad" due to all that cholesterol!  Now they understand that everything gets broken way down in our digestive system, and that it was simplistic to think dietary cholesterol equated to serum cholesterol!  Nutritional science is still evolving, and they have an inherent latency problem;  it can take years to see the health effects of a particular diet. 
    Yesterday in celebrating a minor victory, I had a Pinha colada with wife in the late afternoon on the veranda.  Despite having upped my mg supplement by 240 mg, I still had leg cramps this  morning!  They're saying alcohol is  a no-no since it tends to dehydrate you!  Arrgh!  Apparently nothing is sacred anymore!  My advice is to go online and see what you can learn about leg cramps.  Good luck!
    • 1
  2. Turbo added a post in a topic Static port   

    RDA for magnesium is 400 mg/day,  but many of us fall short.  Low Mg correlates to leg cramps.  Magnesium glycinate is the most bioavailable form.  I supplement. Your body's hydration level also plays a role.  fwiw.
    Static port on only one side means variation with yaw.
    • 2
  3. Turbo added a post in a topic Another engine out from an oil injection failure   

    And the crew at Mikuni!
    • 0
  4. Turbo added a post in a topic Another engine out from an oil injection failure   

    Sorry guys, but in all honesty I need to eat my own words!  I just re-inspected my spare oil pump.  As designed, the pump will revert to 50:1 full oil flow if the cable should break.  The designers cleverly made it as foolproof as possible.  There is a scribed line on the housing, and two, one large and one small on the steel arm connecting to the cable.  When the larger mark on the arm is aligned with the scribed mark on the pump housing, you're at 70:1, the idle setting.  By the time the arm has moved to where the smaller mark aligns with the scribed line on the housing, you're at 50:1.  A cable breakage allows the torsional spring to pull the arm to way beyond where the large mark on the arm would align with the scribed line on the housing.  At this point the eccentric is disengaged, and pump piston stroke is again maximum, so you're back at 50:1.  My idea of a lever stop is a dumb one.  I took it back off when I realized this!
    • 3
  5. Turbo added a topic in Close Call's and dumb stunts   

    Conundra of the ancient aviator
    In the vein of trying out the Avid C STOL as a cruiser, i.e. a vehicle in which one could actually go somewhere, I undertook a trip from the Columbia Gorge down to Grants Pass, in Southern Oregon, to visit dear friends.  In a nutshell, in the end I had to abort, as the day was not sufficiently long for the almost 480 nm out-and-return, even way up here near 46 degs N, and near the solstice at that.
    At first blush I thought that I could plan for 3.5 gph at 74 kts, but very quickly learned why the more experienced of you use 5 gph for planning purposes.  3.5 gph corresponds to 4500 to 4800 rpm, and a piddly 60-65 kts TAS.  Pushing headwinds thru the Gorge I saw a whopping 45kts GS on the GPS!
    Plan the flight, fly the plan, they say.  My clever planning put me along the eastern edge of the Willamette valley, in the western edge of the foothills of the Cascades.  The scenery was lovely, but I couldn’t help thinking how hard it would be on the airplane if I had to make an emergency landing on a stump-covered hill left over from a clearcutting operation.  But the little 582 ran like a top, never missing a beat. 
    Then came the first conundrum: ROABD – Rapid Onset Acute Biological Distress!  Gotta land, and soon!  Just passed a nice little airport.  It felt counterproductive, but I made a hasty 180, entered the pattern, and put her down at the little field, which had a nice long, if narrow, runway.   Nobody was around, so the weeds received some much-needed moisture.  Man, a hypertrophic prostate is a liability!  It’s one of the rewards of surviving to old age.  You’re fine until it’s an all-out emergency.  There’s nothing gradual about it.  There are solutions, but perhaps are not the kind of thing to discuss in polite company.  I leave this judgment to my dear readers.
    O.k., we’re back in the sky.  Feeling fine, ripping along at 65kts, and approaching my (maybe) gas stop, but ROABD strikes again, with a vengeance!  The GPS says there’s a controlled field nearby at Eugene Oregon.  I haven’t been into a controlled field in 40 years or so, although I used to do it all the time.  So, I called them up, got into the pattern, the tower saw me, cleared me to land!  Taxied to the gas pump, where there was a much-appreciated outhouse!  Gas pump ground wire and hose were both snarled up, obviously by some very considerate individual in a big hurry.  Called up the FBO, who sent out two guys who unsnarled things and helped me figure out the very counterintuitive hosering-up protocol.   Yup, I needed that petrol!  I am now loth to plan on more than about 150 nm per leg. 
    With fresh petrol in my tank, ground control guided me over to the runup area, where I did my perfunctory mag check, then proceeded to wait and wait as various other aircraft taxied up and then took off.  Ground control didn’t seem too keen on handing me off to the tower!  So, the last airplane to pull in front of me before my handoff was none other than a 737!  I’m thinking: what am I doing here?  My orientation to his centerline was not perfect, so when he gave a gentle throttle push to taxi onto the runway, my right tire lifted off the tarmac!  Right stick, and it slowly settled back down.  Unsettling, so-to-speak!   
    Anyway, my turn came, and I got out of there.  Realizing how much of the day it had taken to get this far, I decided to abort and fly back home. Unhappy with my original flight plan down, I instead just flew straight lines between uncontrolled fields up the east side of the valley, until I saw the Columbia then turned right.  The flight eastbound through the Gorge was just as beautiful, and just as devoid of emergency landing spots.  Both I84 on the Oregon side and WA14 on the north side were busy.  Again, the little 582 just kept on purring.  Then came conundrum #2.  Apparently, my dietary intake of magnesium is sub-par, and this, combined with my physically rather dry state (preferable, for the obvious reason), my right shin muscle decided to cramp!  With so much adverse yaw, the Avid is not happy flying with feet off of the rudders, so, in order to not wallow about in the sky too much, I kept light rudder pressure on with my left foot.  This was a dumb idea in retrospect.  This caused the bird to fly in a slip with the right wing low.  I passed Hood River and figured I had it made – until I took a look at the vent line and fuel tank window.  Incredibly, there was no indication of fuel in either, although my very carefully calibrated totalizer showed I had at least 4 gallons left!  I could see fuel going down the transparent fuel line, along with bubbles, from the wing tank down to the header.   But this situation was disconcerting to say the least.  I passed a couple of flat fields on which an emergency landing would have been possible, and the thought of a precautionary landing seriously crossed my mind, but fuel was still flowing, bubbles and all, and the 582 was still running fine.  I entered the pattern at Columbia Gorge Regional in Dallesport, announcing “minimum fuel”, and got her down safely, if not gracefully.  On the taxiway I noticed fuel again in the tank window and up the vent tube; clearly this apparent lack of fuel was due to my flying with the right wing low.  The engine could have stopped from fuel starvation, but I was lucky this time. 
    O.K. there are some serious takeaways here:
    1.  For us older guys, many of whom have enlarged prostates, a solution must be found, otherwise we are confined to short hops.  If one is dry, it may be possible to fly out a tank of gas, but that predisposes one to muscle cramping.   I think I have found an answer, but need to gain some validation.  It’s a matter of how to rig a relief tube that works.  Keywords are “Men’s external condom-style catheters”.
    2.  The established RDA for magnesium is 400 mg/day.  Low magnesium levels correlate strongly with muscle cramps.  Dark green leafy veggies like spinach and Broccoli are good, but I’d also supplement at least to the RDA before any long flight.   The American diet classically runs low on Mg.  Magnesium glycinate is apparently the most easily metabolized form.  Ironically, muscle cramping also correlates to low body water level.  This seems to be more of a problem for us older guys.
    3.  My fuel gauge is a totalizer, and I was reasonably confident that it was well calibrated.  Still, when I de-fueled the plane, I had less petrol in the tank than my totalizer said.  I thought I had filled the tank up to about 1” from the gas cap rim, but it was very hard to see in there, and I may have put in less fuel than I thought.  The accuracy of a totalizer critically depends on getting a consistent and complete fill.  I am going to make a wooden T-shaped dipstick to use as a check while refueling.  This is why most airplanes have fuel level gauges!
    4.  If you find yourself behind a big plane and are worried about the prop/jet blast, make sure your airplane is aligned with the expected blast, so you don’t get tipped over!
    5.  I feel a need to carefully assess the rudder null position so I can reasonably fly the airplane feet off, despite the ungraceful wallowing.  I need to know it’s not off on rudder trim.  I may need to add a tab.
    6.  Let’s hear it for the mighty little 582!  
    7.  A little dihedral is not a bad thing.
    • 20 replies
    • 1,859 views
  6. Turbo added a post in a topic Dual radiator?   

    My bellyrad, which I think was for a Kitfox, has only a 1/4" standoff,  and cools my engine nicely.  Cruising I am seeing about 140F.  In climb it gets up to 160F.  Maybe a smaller radiator would need more standoff.
    • 0
  7. Turbo added a post in a topic engine mount engineering   

    FWIW, I took a long look at my Avid's motor mount, and considering the inertia and gyroscopic loads, movement of the thrust center at angles of attack and yaw, in addition to engine weight and G-loads etc. etc. I am glad that it's sturdy-looking, stiff against torques and side loads.  It's just one more thing I don't worry about.  However, I can't believe it really weighs very much.  It does get in the way of properly installing the upper cross-shaft oil line, though!
    • 0
  8. Turbo added a post in a topic Dual radiator?   

    Wow, this sounds great!  I once saw a little oil radiator sitting uncowled inside the fan duct on a DC-10.  Needless to say, I was shocked that it had no cowling to reduce its drag.  It may be that the best drag reduction from even an optimal cowl is not that large!  I am in the process of evaluating the drag reduction for closing up unnecessary openings in the front of my engine cowling.   The bellyrad may not be a bad solution after all!
    • 0
  9. Turbo added a post in a topic Ground wind to tip   

    I agree with Nick.  Nice, decisive flying Jenki!  One nice feature of the Avids is their ability to essentially levitate when power is added!
    • 0
  10. Turbo added a post in a topic Ground wind to tip   

    Does anybody have a provision to tie the stick forward for such conditions?  I'm thinking this might allow one to get out with the plane facing the wind, then walk the windward wing thru the turn to downwind.  Prop stopped, of course.  Most likely you wouldn't be able to muster the leverage for that direction change though...?  Provision to lock either side's brake could make this possible, perhaps.
    Just a thought, maybe a bad one.
    • 0
  11. Turbo added a post in a topic Ground wind to tip   

    So... Just helicopter taxi to the tiedown and land!  But seriously guys, 25 kts is a lot of wind.  Of course a typical installation has the airport's anemometer 30 to 33 ft up!  25 kts reported is likely less on the ground, at wing level.
    • 0
  12. Turbo added a post in a topic Ground wind to tip   

    So here's another wrinkle.  The airport's anemometer is likely on the corner of a rooftop, or a tower, and not down where our wings are while taxiing, and where the wind is likely somewhat less.  So there's a "calibration" issue here, or at least some kind of safety factor, say 5-10 kts.  Now the uncertainty is significant vs. the value of the item of interest.  Uggh!
    • 0
  13. Turbo added a post in a topic Ground wind to tip   

    With a passenger you have a better chance of avoiding disaster as one can get out and walk the windward tip thru the ground turn.  Alone, it's a much scarier (sketchier) situation.  Alternatively one could just sit still in a less dangerous orientation  to the wind, and beg for help over the CTAF!  Still, it's best if you know the limits.  I suppose the critical scenario is taxiing to the tiedowns or hangar after landing, so it's the ground turn away from the wind.  Ostensibly one wouldn't even try flying if the gusts were too high, so turning into the wind is not it,  although the same criterion would apply. Thanks, Chris for that harrowing annecdotal account.  
    • 0
  14. Turbo added a post in a topic Ground wind to tip   

    Yup, Leni, you correctly got my intent.  My real concern, living in the windy gorge, is taxiing, then having to turn into or off of the wind, a maneuver which momentarily places you perpendicular to the wind.  There is no wind component passing over the wing chordwise, so no lift in the traditional sense, but with a dihedraled high wing, there's a chance it could lift up  Once that wing starts lifting up, there's nothing one can do to stop it until the opposite tip hits the tarmac.  Of course, one could get out, go to the windward side, and try to walk it through.
    If nobody has any data here, I may just go to my windy airport (just today gusting to 29kts), loosely tie one wing down, orient that wing upwind, get out my handheld wind meter, and wait for a gust.  At least this way I can bound the problem.
    So, it's about 25 mph?  No offense, but I will feel more comfy if I validate.  Your gear is wider than my stock gear, and I think you said your bird weighs roughly 100 lbs more than mine.  Sort of a moot question in retrospect!
    • 1
  15. Turbo added a topic in Avid Model C   

    Ground wind to tip
    Does anybody have any idea how much wind directly abeam that it would take to tip over a 500 lb empty Avid or KF if not tied down?  Sure, one would use appropriate aileron/elevator while taxiing with a headwind or tailwind component, but I'm talking about the case where the wind is directly abeam.  There's got to be quite an experience base out there...
    • 17 replies
    • 1,908 views
  16. Turbo added a post in a topic conversion of undercamber airfoil to Ribblett   

    Point well taken.  With max AoA set by the landing gear, the takeoff run is shortest with the high camber, and of course the flaperons deployed at the proper time.  Being on floats makes this even more critical.  However, once you're in the air, you lose that AoA constraint, and the steepest angle of climb is set only by wing loading and power loading.  The wing camber level becomes unimportant.  As a TD landplane the penalty for not having so much camber is only in a longer ground run.  The benefit is a faster, more efficient cruise.  
    • 0
  17. Turbo added a post in a topic Avid STOL airfoil -some calculations   

    After 15+ hours I'm still trying to do graceful landings consistently, so I feel your pain.  The old "keep it off, keep it off, keep it off"  mantra doesn't seem to work too well, although Avid advises us to land 3-point.  "Fly it on" seems better advice.  Still, that dance with the feet still feels a bit frenetic to me, so I'm a bit loathe to land with higher speed than is absolutely necessary.  So maybe with full flaps.  But lots of planes have airfoils that are nasty leading-edge stallers.  Like NACA23012, and virtually anything thinner than, say 12%.  Usually it's tamed with a little washout, and holy moly! the Avid's got 4.5 degrees of twist!  That's a lot!  
    Thanks for sharing this cautionary account.
    • 0
  18. Turbo added a post in a topic conversion of undercamber airfoil to Ribblett   

    Just measured mine.  That 2" translates into a 4.5-degree washout!  That's a lot, especially for an AR 7ish constant-chord wing!  Gotta be to protect the most ham-handed of us from ourselves, as you say.
    • 1
  19. Turbo added a post in a topic Motion sickness?   

    When the acceleration sensors in your inner ear send a signal that disagrees with what your eyeballs are saying, your system concludes you must have food poisoning, and tries to order your stomach to void.  Nick's right.  Keep your eyes outside, so you can see the horizon, so the cross-up can't happen.   Having control of the airplane also helps a lot. Exact same occurs onboard a boat.  Take the helm, keep your torso vertical, and eyes on the horizon.  To go below is not good!
    • 1
  20. Turbo added a post in a topic Avid STOL airfoil -some calculations   

    Great feedback.  My remaining objection to VGs is that, by reducing stall speed, they also reduce maneuvering speed.
    Maybe they are good for landing: at least you don't stall & plop down so easily, as I have done many times.
    • 0
  21. Turbo added a post in a topic conversion of undercamber airfoil to Ribblett   

    Mark - That last pic is a heartbreaker!  
    Leni - all that twist might have been to soften up the stall, in addition to keeping it rightside up, by confining onset to the root region.  The cylindrical leading-edge shape is decidedly non-optimal, and strikes me as a significant part of the problem.  
    Yeah, that twist seems excessive.  On the leading edge shape: I wonder how much LE extension it would take to cure, of course with a major redistribution of the streamwise surface curvature locally.  Perhaps a set of glue-on foam sections, wire cut, would do the trick.  This wnter when it's raining...?
    • 0
  22. Turbo added a post in a topic Avid STOL airfoil -some calculations   

    I totally agree.  The induced drag due to that pitch moment is inescapable via speed, as tail download simply increases!  You feel like you've hit a wall or something.  I am currently having trouble learning how to land gracefully, but I think it's a different aspect of this problem, more related to the cylindrical leading edge, as it puts too much surface curvature in a region too far from the stagnation point, so it adds to the overspeed!  Elliptical shapes do better in the leading-edge region.  The airfoil seems to be a leading-edge staller.  You just fall out of the sky, except the wing's twist and lack of taper mean that the wing quits abruptly inboard, with the outboard still flying, so it doesn't roll sharply upon stall.  Guess I've got to learn to fly it on - or do carrier landings!  I've banged it in a time or two!  Still, the Avid's a hoot to fly!  But I'm not ready to paste on VGs - yet!  Those aren't all goodness either.  They reduce maneuvering speed,  slow you down, and make the airplane hard to wash!  The airplane does almost flare itself, but it's like playing chicken with the ground!
    • 0
  23. Turbo added a post in a topic conversion of undercamber airfoil to Ribblett   

    Mark,
    See my post on the undercambered STOL airfoil under Avid Model C.  There's no special magic in Harry Riblett's airfoil.  The USA35B airfoil, and NACA 4415 are similar.  One could help cruise performance by simply filling in the lower-surface concavity with a straight line!  The reduction in nose-down pitching moment is about 40%, which reduces the H-tail download, and induced drag.  One might acccomplish this by gluing on lower-surface ribs shaped out of foam, then skinning on a new second lower surface.  The subtleties of the lower surface shape are relatively unimportant to lift.   Your airplane might lose a little of its STOL magic, though, as the filled-in lower surface in effect shows up as a slightly reduced incidence relative to the fuselage, and effectively lower angle-of-attack with wheels on the tarmac.  The flaperons' killer app is popping you off the tarmac!  From there on, it's all gravy!
    • 1
  24. Turbo added a post in a topic Tail Wheel Swap to a Matco Pneumatic 8"   

    Heat the spring to red-hot in the vicinity of where you will be drilling, then let it cool in still air.  After drilling the hole, heat the spring again to red-hot, then dip it into water. This will undo the anneal and re-establish the martensitic, body-centered cubic lattice structure, returning it to spring steel.  Materials 101.
    • 1
  25. Turbo added a post in a topic Avid STOL airfoil -some calculations   

    Wow!  Gotta try this!  Full flaps appears to only be a 10 deg or so deflection, so I reckon there's little concern for running out of roll authority.
    • 0